Fermat’s last theorem, proved by Andrew Wiles, states that there are no positive whole number solutions for to the equality
for
Yet in an episode of The Simpson’s it was noted that , apparently contradicting Fermat’s last theorem.
Of course this is not a contradiction because is not actually equal to .
So why did The Simpson’s episode say these two numbers were equal?
Well,
while
So, starting from the left we see that the digit in is a 9, while for it is an 8.
David Radcliffe (@daveinstpaul ) tweeted:
“What is the best way to measure the “closeness” of a near-solution to a^p+b^p=c^p? E.g. how “close” is 3987^12 + 4365^12 = 4472^12 really?”
x
The left most digits of these large numbers represent very large quantities.
x
Maybe one way to compare these two numbers is to look at their ratio
.
x
If we have a calculator that’s accurate to 10 decimal places we get the result
x
x
So to 10 decimal places the ratio
is 1.
x
It’s not until we get a more accurate calculator that we see, in fact,
x
x
Another way to think about the relationship between
and
is to take the twelfth root of
.
x
If we really had equality between
and
then
would be
.
x
If we have a calculator that’s accurate to 12 digits, we get
x
It’s only with a more accurate calculator that we see
x
This raises a sort of interesting question:
x
Given a “small” potential error
and an integer
, what solutions are there to
x
x
for positive integers
?